---
title: "21 years ago, i reported a \"Tic Tac\" UFO to Nuforc."
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/21-years-ago-i-reported-a-tic-tac-ufo-to-nuforc-4347"
updated: "2026-10-24T16:04:00.202Z"
description: "A Reddit user says they reported a white, Tic Tac-shaped UFO to the National UFO Reporting Center 21 years ago. The post links to the corresponding NUFORC report, but provides no additional details or corroboration."
sources: ["https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=42936"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# 21 years ago, i reported a "Tic Tac" UFO to Nuforc.

Published: 2026-10-24  
Source: [r/UFOs](https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=42936)

### Overview

A Reddit user has drawn renewed attention to a **National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) case filed more than two decades ago**, claiming that they reported seeing a white, “Tic Tac”-shaped object approximately 21 years ago. The post links to a NUFORC record identified as **case number 42936**, but provides no additional documentation, eyewitness testimony, photographs, video, or independent corroboration.

The claim is notable because the “Tic Tac” description has become closely associated with one of the most prominent modern U.S. military UFO incidents. However, the Reddit post itself does not establish a connection between the reported civilian observation and the later military cases. At this stage, the available information supports only that a user says they submitted a report to NUFORC—not that the observation has been independently verified.

### The Linked NUFORC Record

The cited page is hosted on NUFORC’s website, a long-running organization that collects reports from people who say they have witnessed unidentified aerial phenomena. The link directs to a sighting page with the identifier **42936**. The source material available for review, however, did not display the report’s narrative or associated details.

Instead, the page presented a security-verification screen operated through Cloudflare, indicating that the website was checking whether the visitor was an automated bot. Because the underlying report could not be accessed through the provided source, details such as the exact date, location, duration, apparent motion, altitude, number of witnesses, and conditions of observation remain unconfirmed.

That limitation is important. NUFORC entries are generally based on witness submissions and do not necessarily represent findings that an event was extraterrestrial or otherwise unexplained after investigation. A database listing can document that a report was received, while leaving the interpretation of the sighting unresolved.

### Why the “Tic Tac” Description Matters

The term “Tic Tac” gained widespread public attention after the U.S. Navy acknowledged videos and accounts involving an unidentified object encountered by pilots from the aircraft carrier USS *Nimitz* off the coast of Southern California in 2004. Witnesses described the object as a smooth, elongated white shape, and media coverage subsequently popularized the nickname.

The Navy encounters became central to public discussions about UAP after the release of infrared videos and the 2017 publication of investigative reporting about the incidents. Officials have confirmed that the videos are authentic recordings of military training or operational encounters, while emphasizing that the objects’ identities and capabilities remain undetermined. **The shape alone, however, is not enough to demonstrate that separate sightings involved the same object or phenomenon.**

### What the Available Evidence Shows

The Reddit post offers a potentially interesting historical lead, particularly if the NUFORC record predates or overlaps with public awareness of the Navy cases. Yet the post contains no apparent corroborating material beyond the link, and the source does not provide the original report’s text. It is therefore not possible to assess whether the witness described unusual flight characteristics, whether others saw the object, or whether conventional explanations—such as an aircraft, balloon, drone, or atmospheric effect—were considered.

Until the linked case can be reviewed and the witness’s account independently examined, the report should be treated as **an unverified historical claim rather than evidence of a connection to the 2004 Navy encounters**. Further reporting would require access to the NUFORC entry, clarification from the Reddit user, and, ideally, supporting records or testimony from additional witnesses.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.