---
title: "Altered DNA"
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/altered-dna-4180"
updated: "2026-10-15T16:07:07.676Z"
description: "The post speculates that answers to UAP-related questions may involve human DNA, CRISPR and gene editing, linking these developments to expectations surrounding 2027. It references remarks attributed to David Grusch about the implications of AI accessing human DNA and medical information, but presents no evidence supporting the theory."
sources: ["https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/p/the-best-of-lue-elizondo-ufos-human-52d?utm%5C_campaign=post&utm%5C_medium=web"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# Altered DNA

Published: 2026-10-15  
Source: [r/aliens](https://curtjaimungal.substack.com/p/the-best-of-lue-elizondo-ufos-human-52d?utm%5C_campaign=post&utm%5C_medium=web)

### Overview

A December 2023 interview featuring former Pentagon official Lue Elizondo has become a reference point for online speculation about whether unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) could be connected to human biology, genetic engineering and a possible development timeline extending to **2027**. Published by filmmaker and interviewer Curt Jaimungal, the conversation covers UFO reports, human history, consciousness, time, alleged abductions and DNA. However, the material provided does not establish a connection between UAP and genetic modification, nor does it present evidence that a major event or disclosure is expected in 2027.

The interview, titled *The Best of Lue Elizondo: UFOs, Human History, and Altered DNA*, was published on Dec. 22, 2023, through Jaimungal’s *Theories of Everything* Substack publication. The accompanying video and audio run for approximately 1 hour and 47 minutes. Its chapter list identifies a segment on “DNA” at roughly the 22-minute mark, alongside discussions of philosophy, history, time, alleged alien encounters, Skinwalker Ranch, secrecy and the implications of a possible “paradigm shift.”

### DNA and Gene-Editing Claims

The broader discussion described in the source has been interpreted by some readers as raising questions about whether apparent UAP-related mysteries could involve **altered human DNA** or deliberate biological intervention. That interpretation is sometimes linked to modern gene-editing technologies, including CRISPR, which allows researchers to make targeted changes to genetic material. CRISPR has legitimate applications in medical research and treatment development, but its existence does not demonstrate that extraterrestrial or nonhuman intelligence has manipulated human biology.

The source material does not provide genetic data, medical records, laboratory findings or peer-reviewed research supporting such a claim. Nor does it identify a verified biological sample associated with a UAP case. As a result, any connection between CRISPR, human evolution and alleged nonhuman activity remains speculative. **The distinction between a scientific possibility and evidence of an actual event is central to evaluating these claims.**

### Links to David Grusch and Artificial Intelligence

Online discussions have also connected the DNA theory to remarks attributed to David Grusch, a former U.S. intelligence official who publicly alleged that the U.S. government possesses information about recovered nonhuman craft and biological evidence. Grusch’s widely reported congressional testimony in 2023 focused on alleged government programs and recovered materials; he did not publicly establish that artificial intelligence had accessed human DNA or medical information.

The claim that AI could use comprehensive genetic and medical data to infer, alter or exploit human biology is a separate technological and ethical concern. AI systems can analyze large datasets, including genomic information, but their capabilities depend on the quality of the data, the software, laboratory access and human direction. **No evidence cited in the supplied material shows that an AI system has accessed classified human genetic information in connection with UAP.**

### The 2027 Question

The year 2027 appears in some UAP narratives as a predicted deadline for disclosure, contact or a major revelation. The interview description and chapter list, however, do not document a verified prediction by Elizondo or establish why that year would be significant. Future dates used in online UAP discussions often combine comments by public figures, anonymous claims and interpretations of unrelated events. Without a documented source, corroboration or testable forecast, such timelines should be treated as speculation rather than reporting.

The interview is best understood as a long-form exploration of ideas and personal perspectives, not as a scientific or governmental finding. Elizondo has been an influential figure in public UAP discussions, but the DNA and 2027 narratives remain unsupported by the evidence identified here. Further claims would require verifiable documentation, independent scientific analysis and clear sourcing before they could be considered established developments.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.