---
title: "Avi Loeb calls for digital or physical evidence in UAP investigations"
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/avi-loeb-calls-for-digital-or-physical-evidence-in-uap-investigations-4160"
updated: "2026-10-14T16:16:28.806Z"
description: "In a Medium article, Avi Loeb argues that UAP investigations should move beyond verbal testimony. He calls for digital data or physical evidence to support claims and advance research."
sources: ["https://avi-loeb.medium.com/digital-data-or-material-evidence-please-the-time-is-ripe-to-go-beyond-verbal-testimonies-on-uap-9a1e71350dc7"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# Avi Loeb calls for digital or physical evidence in UAP investigations

Published: 2026-10-13  
Source: [Google News](https://avi-loeb.medium.com/digital-data-or-material-evidence-please-the-time-is-ripe-to-go-beyond-verbal-testimonies-on-uap-9a1e71350dc7)

### Overview

Astrophysicist Avi Loeb is urging UAP investigators and officials to move beyond witness accounts and provide **digital records or physical evidence** that can be independently examined. In a Medium article published October 13, 2026, Loeb argued that claims linking Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) to non-human technology should be evaluated through verifiable data rather than accepted on the basis of testimony alone.

“**Digital data or material evidence please, the time is ripe to go beyond verbal testimonies!**” Loeb wrote. His comments followed a Fox News interview with Jay Stratton, a former director of the U.S. government’s UAP Task Force, who stated that the government and defense contractors possess craft of “non-human origin.”

### Stratton’s Claims

During the interview with host Bret Baier, Stratton said he had personally seen what he described as **non-human beings and non-human craft**. He also claimed that both the government and defense-contractor community possess such vehicles and are involved in an ongoing effort to capture and reverse-engineer the technology.

Stratton attributed the lack of public disclosure to what he characterized as an approximately 80-year effort to keep the subject secret. He said officials believed the information was too sensitive for the public, while adding that Americans could handle confirmation of the “basic fact that we are not alone.”

Those statements remain **unverified in the public record**. Stratton did not present physical artifacts, sensor data, imagery with publicly available provenance, or other materials in the interview that would allow outside researchers to independently assess the claims. Loeb’s central argument is that extraordinary assertions should be accompanied by evidence capable of scrutiny, regardless of the status or experience of the person making them.

### Loeb Seeks Direct Access to Evidence

Loeb wrote that he agrees with Baier’s question about why the public has not seen what officials describe as the “real stuff.” He said he had met Stratton at the PhenomeCon 2026 conference in Utah and subsequently invited him to address the UAP Science Advisory Council, an organization focused on examining evidence and promoting public release of relevant information.

According to Loeb, Stratton did not respond to the invitation, even after it was repeated by Council member Tim Gallaudet. Loeb questioned why Stratton chose to speak with a national television network rather than with a scientific advisory group specifically dedicated to evaluating UAP evidence. **The exchange highlights a recurring divide in the UAP debate:** public allegations often receive significant attention, while access to underlying records and materials remains limited.

### Government Review and Scientific Standards

Loeb also referred to a meeting of the UAP Governing Board at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which he attended after his conference presentation. He said the board includes representatives from the executive branch, military and intelligence communities and follows the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters, or PURSUE.

He argued that such bodies would be willing to review evidence of technologies of non-human origin and suggested that a verified discovery would have major political consequences. However, neither the article nor the interview supplies publicly accessible evidence confirming the existence of non-human craft, bodies or reverse-engineering programs. **Independent authentication, chain-of-custody documentation, calibrated sensor data and peer review** would be essential to determining whether alleged material is genuinely anomalous and not the result of misidentification, fabrication or classified conventional technology.

### The Evidence Question

Loeb’s appeal reflects a broader effort to shift UAP discussions from testimony and secrecy toward testable claims. Witness accounts may help identify incidents for further investigation, but they cannot by themselves establish the origin of an object or phenomenon. Until physical or digital evidence is released for independent examination, claims of non-human technology remain allegations rather than confirmed findings.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.