---
title: "Edited reply discusses an unsuccessful CE-5 contact attempt"
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/edited-reply-discusses-an-unsuccessful-ce-5-contact-attempt-3770"
updated: "2026-09-26T16:07:59.885Z"
description: "The post presents an edited reply to a previous social-media discussion in which a commenter said they attempted a human-initiated contact event using the CE-5 protocol but reported no encounter. The provided excerpt does not include the reply’s substantive content or any corroborating evidence."
sources: ["https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/01/26/prime-contactees-a-special-group-of-contact-experiencers-and-why-they-are-important/"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# Edited reply discusses an unsuccessful CE-5 contact attempt

Published: 2026-09-25  
Source: [r/aliens](https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/01/26/prime-contactees-a-special-group-of-contact-experiencers-and-why-they-are-important/)

### Overview

An edited reply circulating in a social-media discussion addresses an **unsuccessful human-initiated CE-5 contact attempt**, in which a commenter reported following the protocol but said they experienced no encounter. The available excerpt does not reproduce the reply’s substantive argument, nor does it provide independent documentation, witnesses, recordings or other corroborating evidence. As a result, the material offers limited information about the specific attempt and cannot establish whether the reported method was properly followed or why no unusual event was observed.

The discussion is associated with a broader article published by physician and UFO researcher **J. Burkes MD** on January 26, 2022. Titled “Prime Contactees: a Special Group of Contact Experiencers and Why They are Important,” the article examines people who claim recurring contact experiences and who use meditation, group activity or other consciousness-based practices to seek communication with alleged non-human intelligences.

### The “Prime Contactee” Concept

Burkes writes that he first introduced the term “prime contactees” on social media in 2014, prompting criticism from some UFO activists who viewed the label as elitist or divisive. He says the concept was later presented in edited form after the controversy. The author also argues that language shapes how experiencers understand their role, suggesting that **“contact worker”** may be more appropriate than “contactee.”

In his view, the suffix “-ee” implies a passive recipient, while “contact worker” better describes people who actively participate in contact networks or independently carry out protocols intended to attract or communicate with UFO-related intelligences. Burkes contrasts this approach with earlier contactee traditions, in which an individual’s personal encounter often became the central message. He connects the newer model to a proposed worldwide transformation of consciousness and to social issues including war, hunger, racism and climate change.

### Claimed Characteristics

The article describes “prime contactees” as a small group of experiencers who, according to Burkes, display several recurring characteristics. These include alleged contact beginning in childhood or early adulthood, meditation or other consciousness practices developed at a young age, and claimed abilities involving nonverbal or psychic communication. The author also cites repeated UFO sightings reportedly witnessed by other people, which he says may allow individuals to share their experiences with a wider audience.

Another stated characteristic is a **sense of mission**—either informing the public about the importance of contact or supporting other experiencers. The source excerpt ends partway through this list, so it does not present the article’s complete criteria or the evidence Burkes uses to evaluate particular individuals.

### Context and Limitations

CE-5, commonly described as “close encounters of the fifth kind,” generally refers to deliberate attempts by people to initiate contact with alleged extraterrestrial or non-human entities. Practices can include meditation, visualization, group intention and signaling. However, CE-5 remains outside established scientific methodology, and reports of success are usually based on personal testimony rather than independently verified measurements.

The unsuccessful attempt discussed in the edited reply therefore illustrates an important limitation: **a lack of an encounter neither confirms nor disproves the underlying claims**, but it does provide no positive evidence for them. Assessing such reports would require clearly documented procedures, contemporaneous records, independent observers and careful consideration of ordinary explanations for perceived lights, aircraft, satellites or other stimuli. The available material does not supply that level of verification.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.