---
title: "Avi Loeb attributes rising light after meteor strike to atmospheric effects"
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/mysterious-rising-light-after-meteor-strike-avi-loeb-has-explanation-newsnation-2607"
updated: "2026-05-31T16:00:53.170Z"
description: "The article examines a bright, rising light seen after a meteor impact that sparked UFO speculation, but Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb attributes it to ordinary atmospheric effects and debris. He argues the phenomenon fits known physics, eliminating the need for an extraterrestrial explanation."
sources: ["https://www.newsnationnow.com/space/meteor-volcano-video-uap-avi-loeb/"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# Avi Loeb attributes rising light after meteor strike to atmospheric effects

Published: 2026-05-31  
Source: [Google News](https://www.newsnationnow.com/space/meteor-volcano-video-uap-avi-loeb/)

### Overview  

A viral video captured a **bright, green‑hued meteor** streaking across the sky and apparently striking near the active Mayon volcano on Luzon, Philippines. The footage, posted by Afar.TV, shows a fireball colliding with the volcano’s plume, followed seconds later by a luminous point that appears to rise from the impact zone. The dramatic sequence quickly sparked online speculation about a possible unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) or even extraterrestrial technology.  

### What the Video Shows  

The clip, recorded on May 26 2026, depicts a meteor entering the atmosphere over Mayon, a volcano known for its near‑perfect cone and frequent eruptions. As the meteoroid penetrates the dense volcanic ash, it leaves a vivid green trail before exploding in a flash of light. Within a few moments, a smaller, steadily bright object emerges from the fireball’s aftermath, moving upward against the darkening sky. The video’s high‑definition frame rate and the volcano’s glowing lava flow have contributed to its rapid spread across social media platforms.  

### Scientific Explanation  

Harvard University astrophysicist **Avi Loeb**, director of the Galileo Project—a research program that systematically searches for technological signatures of non‑human origin—provided a grounded interpretation on “NewsNation Prime.” Loeb argued that the rising light is **most likely a glint from a satellite reflecting sunlight**, not a piece of alien hardware.  

> “There are more than 10,000 communications satellites moving around the Earth, so it’s not very unlikely to see such a thing,” Loeb said.  

He noted that the geometry of the scene—sunlight striking a satellite’s solar panels at a shallow angle—can produce a brief, intense flash that mimics a rising object when captured from a ground‑based perspective. This explanation fits within established orbital mechanics and atmospheric optics, requiring no departure from known physics.  

### Expert Commentary  

Supporting Loeb’s assessment, Peter Brown, a planetary‑impact physicist at Western University in Ontario, told *The New York Times* that the meteor itself likely disintegrated completely in the atmosphere.  

> “It is possible, but not likely, this produced a meteorite. My bet, particularly given the prominent trail, would be nothing survived.”  

Brown’s analysis underscores that meteoroids entering Earth’s atmosphere at high velocity often vaporize, especially when encountering dense volcanic ash, which can enhance ablation. The combination of rapid deceleration and intense heating makes the survival of solid fragments improbable.  

### Context and Broader Implications  

The incident arrives at a time when public interest in UAPs is heightened, following recent governmental reports and increased media coverage of anomalous aerial observations. The Galileo Project, founded by Loeb in 2021, aims to apply rigorous scientific methodology to such reports, distinguishing between genuine technosignatures and mundane explanations.  

In this case, the convergence of three independent factors—a meteor, an active volcanic plume, and a passing satellite—created a perfect visual illusion. The episode illustrates the challenges of interpreting fleeting, low‑resolution footage and reinforces the need for **multi‑sensor verification** (radar, spectroscopic analysis, and satellite tracking) before assigning extraordinary causes.  

### Conclusion  

While the glowing ascent captured after the Mayon meteor strike offers an eye‑catching visual, the consensus among leading scientists is that it reflects ordinary atmospheric and orbital phenomena. Avi Loeb’s satellite‑glint hypothesis, bolstered by Peter Brown’s impact analysis, demonstrates how conventional physics can account for seemingly mysterious events. As the search for genuine extraterrestrial technosignatures continues, episodes like this serve as a reminder that **rigorous, evidence‑based inquiry remains the most reliable path to understanding our sky**.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.