---
title: "Photograph reportedly shows an unidentified object over New Mexico in 1967"
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/photograph-reportedly-shows-an-unidentified-object-over-new-mexico-in-1967-4731"
updated: "2026-11-12T16:10:39.902Z"
description: "A Reddit post presents a photograph said to show an unidentified object over New Mexico in 1967 and asks viewers to identify it. The provided information does not include details about the photographer, location, provenance, or any confirmed explanation."
sources: ["https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Febcbrqqg1k"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# Photograph reportedly shows an unidentified object over New Mexico in 1967

Published: 2026-11-12  
Source: [r/aliens](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Febcbrqqg1k)

### Overview

A black-and-white photograph reportedly showing an unidentified object over New Mexico in 1967 has resurfaced online, prompting renewed discussion among UFO researchers and social-media users. The image was presented in a Reddit post and analyzed in a recent video, but the available material does not establish the photographer’s identity, the precise location, or the photograph’s chain of custody.

The video claims that the picture was taken by a student at **New Mexico State University** during a geology class field exercise. According to the account, the student encountered the object while working in the desert and captured it against a landscape framed by two prominent rocky cliffs. The object appears metallic and broadly saucer-shaped, suspended above the ground.

### What the Image Appears to Show

The photograph’s central subject is a dark, disc-like form positioned between the cliffs. Because the image is monochromatic and apparently limited in resolution, details such as surface texture, distance, scale and motion are difficult to determine. No accompanying documentation has been provided to independently confirm when or where the photograph was taken.

The video’s presenter focused particularly on the object’s orientation. One possibility discussed was that it could be a conventional “flying saucer” viewed from an unusual angle. Another was that the form might be spherical or vertically oriented, though the recording offers no measurable evidence to distinguish among those interpretations. **The photograph alone does not establish the object’s identity or physical characteristics.**

### Claims About Authenticity

The analyst argued that the image was not “manipulated” or “doctored,” and noted that it predates consumer drones by several decades. Those observations were offered as reasons to consider explanations other than a modern drone or digitally altered image. However, the summary does not indicate that the photograph has undergone a documented forensic examination, comparison with original negatives, or review by an independent imaging expert.

The absence of drones in 1967 may rule out one contemporary explanation, but it does not by itself demonstrate that the object was an extraterrestrial craft. Other possibilities—including a distant aircraft, a thrown or suspended object, a geological feature, a photographic artifact, or a staged image—would require investigation of the original photograph and the circumstances of capture.

### Speculation and Missing Evidence

The video also explores broader theories, including extraterrestrial technology, links to ancient civilizations and the possibility of time travel. These ideas remain speculative. No corroborating witnesses, field notes, university records, weather data, negatives or authenticated provenance were cited in the material reviewed.

That lack of documentation is especially important because historical UFO photographs can change meaning as they are reposted without their original context. Identifying the alleged student photographer, locating New Mexico State University records from 1967 and determining the image’s earliest known publication could help establish whether the account has a verifiable historical foundation.

### Assessment

The analyst ultimately described the photograph as **“a very interesting picture”** and acknowledged being “confounded” by it, while inviting viewers to offer their own explanations. At present, the image is best characterized as an **unidentified photograph**, rather than confirmed evidence of an unusual aircraft or non-human technology.

Further analysis may clarify the picture’s origin and reveal whether the object can be explained through ordinary photographic or environmental causes. Until that work is done, the photograph remains an intriguing but unverified claim from the history of UFO reports in the American Southwest.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.