---
title: "Poster reports seeing three orbs and a jellyfish-shaped object"
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/poster-reports-seeing-three-orbs-and-a-jellyfish-shaped-object-3817"
updated: "2026-09-29T16:03:16.139Z"
description: "The poster reports seeing three orb-like objects and one object they describe as “jellyfish”-shaped, and says they recorded video of the sightings. Two Google Drive video links were provided, but no further details or independent identification are included in the available post text."
sources: ["https://drive.google.com/file/d/17GKkew9YhpuHoGWQhVx8Hc9jkHUaCSow/view?usp=drivesdk"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# Poster reports seeing three orbs and a jellyfish-shaped object

Published: 2026-09-29  
Source: [r/InterdimensionalNHI](https://drive.google.com/file/d/17GKkew9YhpuHoGWQhVx8Hc9jkHUaCSow/view?usp=drivesdk)

### Reported Observation

A poster has reported seeing **three orb-like objects and a fourth object described as “jellyfish”-shaped**, claiming that video footage was recorded during the observation. The report appears to have been accompanied by two Google Drive links, including a file identified as **“IMG_7201.MOV.”** However, the available post text does not provide the date, time, location, viewing conditions, or circumstances surrounding the sighting.

The description of multiple luminous or unusual objects is consistent with the broad category commonly labeled **unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP)**. That designation indicates only that an observation has not been conclusively identified; it does not establish that the objects were extraterrestrial, technologically advanced, or operating outside known physical explanations.

### Available Video Information

The source material identifies a Google Drive-hosted video and references a second video link, but it does not include a publicly accessible transcript, technical metadata, or an independent analysis of the recordings. The provided Drive page displays standard file-viewing elements, including a video player and a notice that chapters were unavailable. It also indicates that permission may be required to access or edit the file.

Because the underlying footage could not be independently evaluated from the supplied text, **the appearance, movement, duration, brightness, and apparent distance of the objects remain unverified**. It is therefore not possible to determine whether the reported “orbs” were aircraft lights, balloons, satellites, drones, reflections, optical artifacts, or another phenomenon. Likewise, the “jellyfish” description appears to be a visual comparison by the observer rather than a confirmed classification.

### Missing Context

Several details normally needed to assess an aerial sighting are absent. These include the observer’s location, the direction and elevation of the objects, weather and cloud conditions, the length of the event, whether the objects moved independently, and whether other witnesses were present. Information about the recording device—such as its model, lens, zoom level, frame rate, and whether digital enhancement was used—would also be important.

Such factors can significantly affect how distant lights and airborne objects appear on video. Camera autofocus, lens flare, motion blur, compression, and reflections can produce shapes that seem to change or develop appendages. Perspective and atmospheric distortion may also make ordinary objects appear unusually large or close.

### Assessment

At this stage, the report is best characterized as an **unverified eyewitness account supported by purported video files**. The existence of links or a recording does not by itself confirm the interpretation of the objects. A meaningful review would require access to the original, uncompressed files, examination of their metadata, and comparison with aviation, satellite, weather, and astronomical records for the relevant time and location.

The available source material contains no statement from aviation authorities, scientific organizations, or independent investigators identifying the objects. Until those details and analyses are available, the sighting remains unresolved. Further information from the poster—particularly the location, timestamp, original files, and a description of the objects’ movement—would be necessary to assess the report more reliably.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.