---
title: "Reddit user analyzes 351 incident reports in 478 declassified PURSUE files"
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/reddit-user-analyzes-351-incident-reports-in-478-declassified-pursue-files-4738"
updated: "2026-11-12T16:16:53.902Z"
description: "A Reddit user says they transcribed and classified seven PURSUE releases totaling 478 files and 12,389 pages from 11 agencies. Of 351 incident reports, the user reports that 24 record a mundane explanation, 187 remain unresolved, and 49 of those unresolved cases rely solely on witness testimony without radar or sensor data."
sources: ["http://uapinsight.com/pursue/map"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# Reddit user analyzes 351 incident reports in 478 declassified PURSUE files

Published: 2026-11-11  
Source: [r/UFOs](http://uapinsight.com/pursue/map)

### Overview

A Reddit user has published an independent analysis of seven declassified **PURSUE** releases, claiming to have transcribed and classified **478 files comprising 12,389 pages** from 11 government agencies. According to the user’s review, the material contains **351 incident reports** involving unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), although the documents do not necessarily represent 351 wholly separate events. The analysis is presented as a research project rather than an official government assessment, and its conclusions have not been independently validated by a federal agency.

The review reports that **24 incidents contain a mundane explanation** in the records, while **187 remain unresolved**. Of those unresolved cases, the researcher says **49 rely solely on witness testimony**, with no associated radar, photographic, or other sensor data identified in the files. The figures offer a snapshot of how unevenly documented historical UAP reports can be, particularly when records were created decades ago and preserved across multiple agencies.

### Geographic Pattern

An accompanying map published by UAP Insight organizes the incidents by location. The website identifies **94 cases** that can be represented geographically: **67 name a specific site or town, 21 identify only a broader region, country, or sea, and six cannot be placed on a map**. The map uses individual markers for precise locations and shaded areas for reports whose locations are less specific. Its colors reflect the conclusions recorded in the underlying case files.

The mapped incidents span a wide range of locations and time periods. Examples listed include **1947 sightings near Birmingham and Maxwell Field, Alabama**, the Chiles-Whitted Eastern Air Lines encounter near Montgomery, and a DC-3 report from Bethel, Alaska. California entries include reports associated with Hamilton Field, Muroc Air Field, Bakersfield, and Fairfield-Suisun Air Force Base. The database also includes more recent cases, such as reports near Cheyenne Mountain and Colorado Springs in 2022 and 2023.

### What the Records Show

The database’s location listings illustrate why a simple count of “UFO cases” can be misleading. Some entries refer to multiple witnesses or related observations at one location, while others describe an event only as occurring over a broad area. The Washington, D.C., radar sightings of July 1952, for example, are labeled **“Explained in the record,”** whereas several nearby or historically similar cases remain marked unresolved.

The analysis also underscores the distinction between an unexplained report and evidence of extraordinary technology. An unresolved case generally means that the available records do not establish what was observed; it does not, by itself, demonstrate an extraterrestrial or otherwise anomalous origin. Reports based solely on testimony may be important historical accounts, but they are difficult to evaluate without contemporaneous documentation, reliable measurements, or corroborating data.

### Significance and Limitations

The PURSUE files appear to bring together records generated for different purposes, by agencies with varying reporting standards and investigative methods. Differences in terminology, incomplete documentation, duplicate reporting, and uncertain locations can all affect the totals. The Reddit user’s classifications may therefore serve as a useful guide to the archive, but they should be treated as **an independent interpretation of declassified material**, not a definitive statistical account.

The project’s principal value is its effort to make a large and dispersed body of records easier to examine. By separating cases with recorded explanations from those that remain unresolved—and by identifying how many lack instrumental evidence—the analysis provides context often missing from broad UAP discussions. Further review by historians, data specialists, and government archivists would be needed to confirm the classifications and determine whether the files contain additional evidence not reflected in the initial tally.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.