---
title: "The same USO/UAP is seen moving quickly through the water on opposite sides of the world; filmed in North Carolina and Croatia"
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/the-same-usouap-is-seen-moving-quickly-through-the-water-on-opposite-sides-of-the-world-filmed-in-no-4076"
updated: "2026-10-10T16:06:53.328Z"
description: "A Reddit post compares two videos said to show a similar unidentified object moving rapidly through water, filmed in North Carolina and Croatia. The post presents them as possible USO/UAP sightings, but provides no verified evidence establishing that the objects are the same or identifying their nature."
sources: ["https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Updated-Testimony-Gallaudet.pdf"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# The same USO/UAP is seen moving quickly through the water on opposite sides of the world; filmed in North Carolina and Croatia

Published: 2026-10-10  
Source: [r/UFOB](https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Updated-Testimony-Gallaudet.pdf)

### Overview

A Reddit post is drawing attention to two videos said to show a similar unidentified object moving rapidly through water—one recorded in **North Carolina** and the other in **Croatia**. The post presents the footage as a possible example of a USO, or “unidentified submerged object,” and suggests that the same phenomenon may have been observed on opposite sides of the world. However, the material currently available does not establish that the objects are identical, nor does it confirm that either video depicts a craft operating beneath the water.

The comparison appears to rely primarily on visual similarities, including the objects’ apparent speed and movement across the water’s surface. No independently verified information has been provided regarding the dates, locations, recording devices, witnesses, environmental conditions or original files associated with the clips. Without that information, analysts cannot reliably determine whether the videos show an anomalous object, a conventional vessel, an optical effect, marine life or another phenomenon.

### What the Available Evidence Shows

The Reddit post is not accompanied by documentation demonstrating a common object, coordinated event or connection between the North Carolina and Croatian recordings. In particular, there is no publicly cited radar data, satellite imagery, sonar information, maritime traffic record or official investigative finding linking the two incidents. The videos’ provenance—how they were obtained, edited or reposted—would also need to be established before meaningful comparisons could be made.

The footage should therefore be treated as **unverified visual material**, rather than evidence of a transoceanic or globally recurring UAP. Apparent high speed can be misleading in short videos, especially when the camera is moving, the viewing angle is low, waves obscure an object’s dimensions, or digital compression removes visual details. A proper assessment would require original, uncompressed recordings and measurements of distance, time, perspective and environmental conditions.

### Relevant Congressional Context

The comparison comes amid renewed U.S. government scrutiny of unidentified anomalous phenomena. In written testimony submitted for a November 2024 House Oversight hearing, retired Rear Adm. Tim Gallaudet described a 2015 incident involving Navy personnel during a pre-deployment exercise off the U.S. East Coast. Gallaudet wrote that he received an urgent email warning of **“multiple near-midair collisions”** and asking recipients to identify the objects involved.

According to his testimony, the email included what is now known as the “Go Fast” video, recorded by an F/A-18 aircraft’s forward-looking infrared sensor. Gallaudet said the object displayed characteristics he considered unlike known U.S. military systems and expressed concern that the incident was not adequately addressed as a flight-safety matter. His account concerns an airborne UAP—not a submerged object—and does not provide evidence connecting the 2015 Navy incident to the North Carolina or Croatian videos.

### What Would Be Needed Next

Establishing whether the two water videos depict the same object would require more than a visual resemblance. Investigators would need to authenticate the recordings, identify the exact locations and times, reconstruct the camera perspectives and compare weather, sea state and maritime activity. Additional sensor data—such as radar, sonar or infrared imagery—could help determine whether the apparent movement reflects a solid object and whether it was traveling through water, above the surface or along the horizon.

For now, the videos remain an **interesting but unsubstantiated UAP claim**. The geographic distance between North Carolina and Croatia makes the comparison notable, but distance alone does not establish a connection. Until the original footage and supporting records are independently examined, the assertion that a single USO was filmed on opposite sides of the world remains speculative.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.