---
title: "Youngest NASA astronaut to walk on the Moon calls UFOs ‘demonic’ aircraft"
url: "https://usubjects.com/article/youngest-nasa-astronaut-to-walk-on-the-moon-calls-ufos-demonic-aircraft-4157"
updated: "2026-10-14T16:15:05.691Z"
description: "The New York Post reports that the youngest NASA astronaut to walk on the Moon has described UFOs as “demonic” aircraft sent by the devil. The item provides no further details in the supplied text about the astronaut’s identity or the basis for the claim."
sources: ["https://nypost.com/2026/10/13/science/former-nasa-astronaut-claims-ufos-are-demons-in-disguise/"]
licence: "All rights reserved"
---

# Youngest NASA astronaut to walk on the Moon calls UFOs ‘demonic’ aircraft

Published: 2026-10-13  
Source: [Google News](https://nypost.com/2026/10/13/science/former-nasa-astronaut-claims-ufos-are-demons-in-disguise/)

### Overview

A former NASA astronaut described unidentified flying objects as **“demonic” aircraft sent by the devil**, according to a New York Post report published Oct. 13, 2026. The characterization places a religious interpretation on UFOs—now more commonly called unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAP—rather than treating them solely as unexplained observations or potential aerospace technology.

The report identifies the speaker as the **youngest NASA astronaut to walk on the Moon**, but the supplied material does not name the astronaut or provide a transcript, interview recording or additional explanation of how the claim was reached. The New York Post headline uses the phrase “demons in disguise,” while the summary describes the objects as aircraft sent by the devil.

### The astronaut’s reported status

The description most closely corresponds to **Charles Duke**, who walked on the Moon during NASA’s Apollo 16 mission in April 1972. Duke was 36 when he became the 10th person to step onto the lunar surface and remains widely recognized as the youngest person to do so.

However, because the supplied article content does not explicitly identify Duke, the attribution should be treated cautiously. It is not clear from the available material whether the report refers to Duke or another former astronaut, nor when or where the remarks were made. Those details would be important in assessing the context, intended meaning and reliability of the statement.

### What is known about the claim

The report provides no documented evidence linking UFOs to demonic or supernatural forces. It also does not describe a specific sighting, identify a vehicle allegedly observed by the astronaut or cite technical data supporting the claim. As presented, the statement is a personal interpretation rather than a verified finding from NASA, the U.S. government or an independent scientific investigation.

That distinction is significant because an unidentified object is not automatically evidence of extraterrestrial, paranormal or hostile activity. “UAP” generally refers to an observation that has not yet been conclusively identified; the label itself does not establish the object’s origin.

### Broader UAP context

NASA and the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office have examined reports of unusual objects in the atmosphere and near military training areas. Public reviews have emphasized the need for better-quality data, including reliable imagery, radar information and eyewitness corroboration. Although some cases remain unresolved, official investigations have not publicly established that UAP are extraterrestrial craft—or that they have a supernatural origin.

Former astronauts frequently attract attention when discussing UFOs because of their experience with spaceflight, aviation and unusual visual phenomena. That experience can provide valuable perspective, but it does not by itself verify claims outside established scientific evidence.

### Need for further documentation

The New York Post report highlights a striking claim, but the limited information available leaves several key questions unanswered: **Who made the statement? What was the precise wording? Was it offered as a literal belief, a theological interpretation or a rhetorical comment?** No corroborating evidence or independent expert assessment is included in the supplied material.

Until those details emerge, the remarks are best understood as the reported personal view of a former astronaut—not as a NASA position or evidence that UFOs are demonic aircraft.

## Provenance

This USUBJECTS page is a summary or digest of the linked original source. Any accompanying generated visual is an illustrative reconstruction, not evidence.