Infamous Tri-State UFO encounter is missing from new government files - Courier & Press

Overview

The U.S. government’s latest wave of declassified UFO‑related documents, released this month through the Department of Defense’s UAP portal, contains hundreds of files and thousands of pages of material gathered over the past several decades. Yet, a review by the Evansville Courier & Press found that the 1973 “Tri‑State” UFO encounter, one of the most frequently cited sightings in ufology circles, is absent from the batch. The omission has prompted scholars and local historians to question how exhaustive the newly released records truly are and whether other high‑profile cases may also be missing.


The Tri‑State Encounter

On the night of October 2, 1973, witnesses across Indiana, Kentucky, and Illinois reported a series of coordinated lights and craft moving in formation over the tri‑state area. The incident, often referred to as the “Goblin” sightings because of the peculiar, pulsating shapes described, generated a flood of newspaper reports, police logs, and a subsequent congressional inquiry. Over the years, the case has been cited in academic studies of anomalous aerial phenomena and featured in documentaries exploring Cold‑War‑era sightings. Its prominence made the expectation that it would appear in the latest declassification reasonable.


What the New Files Contain

The released collection, hosted at war.gov/ufo, includes over 1,200 PDFs ranging from radar transcripts and pilot testimonies to internal memos about the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP). According to the Courier & Press analysis, the documents cover regional reports from Ohio to Texas, but none reference the Evansville‑area sightings or the 1973 Tri‑State event. “We scoured the index, searched by keywords such as ‘Evansville,’ ‘1973,’ and ‘tri‑state,’ and came up empty,” reported Jon Webb, senior reporter for the paper. “The absence is conspicuous given the case’s historical weight.”


Expert Reactions

UFO researchers and archivists expressed a mix of disappointment and caution. Dr. Emily Hart, senior fellow at the Center for UFO Studies, noted, “The declassification effort is undeniably a step forward, but the missing Tri‑State file suggests that the process is still selective.” Hart added that some records may have been redacted for national‑security reasons or remain in separate archives, such as the National Archives’ classified holdings. Meanwhile, Michael “Mick” Collins, a local historian who has compiled oral histories of the 1973 sightings, said, “If the government possessed detailed reports, they would likely have been part of the public release. Their omission raises legitimate questions about completeness.”


Possible Explanations

Officials at the Department of Defense have not provided a specific rationale for the exclusion. A spokesperson for the UAP office said, “The current release reflects the material that has been cleared for public disclosure after a thorough review. Some files may still be under evaluation.” Analysts suggest that the Tri‑State case, which involved civilian witnesses and limited military involvement, might have been filed under local law‑enforcement archives rather than the defense‑focused repositories that were prioritized for release. Others speculate that the documents could have been lost, destroyed, or never formally submitted to the central UFO program.


Implications for Transparency

The missing Tri‑State encounter underscores the challenges inherent in assessing the full scope of the government’s UFO investigations. While the new batch provides unprecedented insight into official attitudes toward unidentified aerial phenomena, the gaps highlight the need for continued pressure on agencies to audit and disclose all relevant records. As researchers await further releases, the episode serves as a reminder that historical transparency often proceeds in stages, and that the public’s understanding of past sightings may still be evolving.