Overview
In a Newsmax interview aired on February 17, 2026, Representative Eric Burlison (R‑MO) discussed allegations from unnamed government sources concerning a massive unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP) located overseas that, according to the claims, is too large to be moved. The segment also featured Dr. Steven Greer, founder of The Disclosure Project, who cited whistle‑blower reports of similarly enormous craft near Fort Sill, Oklahoma, and in the mountains outside Seoul, South Korea. Both participants framed the discussion around the challenges congressional oversight faces when attempting to obtain access to highly classified UAP sites.
Alleged Immovable Objects
Rep. Burlison described a scenario in which a foreign‑based object is “so large that a structure had to be built around it to hide its location.” Dr. Greer added that investigators with high‑level clearances were briefed on a site near Seoul between 2002 and 2010, and that a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) was allegedly erected around a smaller craft near Fort Sill. According to Greer, the craft’s dimensions range from “hundreds to thousands of feet wide,” and its material is purportedly resistant to conventional cutting tools, including high‑powered lasers and diamond‑tipped saws. No publicly released photographs or physical samples have been presented, and both men acknowledged that the evidence remains classified.
Sources and Context
The interview referenced several historical touchpoints. Dr. Greer mentioned a 2009 briefing document that, according to him, was provided to former White House senior advisor John Podesta. A brief clip of former President Barack Obama was also shown, in which he stated that “aliens are real,” while clarifying that he had not personally seen concrete evidence. These references are intended to illustrate a pattern of government secrecy that dates back to the late 1950s, when officials allegedly began to compartmentalize UAP information to protect “national security” interests.
Congressional Oversight and Obstacles
Rep. Burlison, a member of the House Oversight Committee’s UAP subpanel, recounted repeated “red‑tape” hurdles and inter‑agency “turf wars” that have limited his ability to visit even domestic reverse‑engineering facilities near Washington, D.C. He emphasized that while he has not yet seen “hard evidence,” his mandate is to push for transparent disclosure if definitive proof of non‑human technology emerges. The representative’s statements align with a broader bipartisan push in Congress to declassify UAP data, as reflected in recent legislation mandating annual reporting to intelligence committees.
Outlook and Implications
The interview underscores a growing tension between legislative investigators seeking openness and executive‑branch entities that retain tight control over classified UAP material. While Dr. Greer asserts that documented evidence exists but is being withheld, Rep. Burlison maintains a cautious stance, pledging to inform the public should verifiable proof surface. Analysts note that without independent verification—such as peer‑reviewed data, physical artifacts, or corroborated eyewitness testimony—the claims remain speculative. Nonetheless, the dialogue reflects an increasing demand for accountability and may influence future policy decisions regarding the handling and possible disclosure of UAP information.
