Tucker Carlson’s recent remarks about a supposed “deal” between the United States government and “demons” for nuclear technology have reignited a fringe narrative that blends UFO folklore with supernatural belief. During an early‑November appearance on The Megyn Kelly Show and later on Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast, Carlson claimed that “spiritual entities” have been in contact with U.S. officials and that the nation may have exchanged technology for access to nuclear secrets. The statements, which were not accompanied by any verifiable evidence, quickly spread across social‑media platforms and prompted a flurry of commentary from journalists, academics, and government representatives.
The idea that non‑human forces—whether extraterrestrial or otherworldly—have contributed to humanity’s technological breakthroughs is not new, but it has taken on a distinct religious flavor in recent years. Documentary filmmaker and investigative reporter Steven Greenstreet, who hosts the New York Post series The Basement Office, described the movement as a “paranormal religion” that is gaining footholds within Washington. Greenstreet told The International Business Times UK that adherents of the belief system have “infiltrated the US government and embedded followers into sensitive positions,” suggesting a level of organization that extends beyond casual conspiracy‑theory circles. However, Greenstreet also noted that concrete proof of such infiltration remains elusive, and that much of the narrative is sustained by anecdotal accounts and speculative interpretation of declassified documents.
Scientists and officials have repeatedly emphasized the lack of credible evidence linking any supernatural or extraterrestrial agency to the development of nuclear weapons. Astrophysicist Avi Loeb, who has long advocated for serious scientific investigation of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), cautioned that “the line between rigorous inquiry and myth‑making is thin, and we must not let sensational claims drown out empirical research.” NASA’s UAP task force, established under the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act, has released quarterly reports that focus on sensor data, flight dynamics, and potential national‑security implications, explicitly avoiding supernatural explanations. A senior Pentagon spokesperson reiterated that “all classified programs related to nuclear technology are subject to strict oversight and are not influenced by any non‑human actors.”
The resurgence of such claims highlights a broader cultural shift in which a segment of the public is increasingly skeptical of traditional scientific authority while simultaneously more receptive to alternative explanations for complex phenomena. Polls conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2024 indicated that roughly 35 % of Americans believe that “some form of non‑human intelligence has visited Earth,” a figure that has risen steadily over the past decade. Psychologists attribute this trend partly to the erosion of trust in institutions and the appeal of narratives that provide a sense of hidden knowledge or empowerment. Nonetheless, mainstream media outlets continue to apply journalistic standards, demanding corroboration before presenting extraordinary assertions as fact.
In response to Carlson’s comments, several members of Congress issued statements urging caution. Representative Mike Turner (R‑OH) said, “While I support robust oversight of classified programs, we must not conflate legitimate security concerns with unsubstantiated paranormal theories.” Democratic Representative Jenna Miller (D‑CA) added, “Our focus should be on transparency, accountability, and the scientific method—not on sensationalist speculation that distracts from real policy challenges.” The Senate Armed Services Committee has scheduled a closed‑door briefing next month to review the status of UAP investigations, though no agenda item references supernatural entities.
As the debate unfolds, the episode underscores the tension between open‑ended inquiry and evidentiary rigor. While the allure of a hidden pact with otherworldly forces captures imaginations, the prevailing consensus among experts remains that nuclear technology, like any other advanced capability, is the product of human ingenuity, extensive research, and, in the case of weapons, political decision‑making. Until verifiable data emerges, claims of demonic bargains will likely remain in the realm of fringe belief rather than mainstream policy discourse.
